What did I do? I asked ChatGPT to help me find a legal definition of a pet. I am an ignorant non-expert in this field. So please sub in "non-human animals" anywhere I say "animals" or equivalent above. Animals have to live somewhere on this spectrum, so where on the spectrum is morally right?Įdit: In seeing your replies elsewhere, I am well aware humans are indeed animals in a taxonomical sense. It's sophistry and missing the point which can succinctly be put as this: Is owning animals (as personal property for companionship, agricultural or other use) morally wrong? Today we've decided not to treat people like this, but I'd have no issue if somebody owns a toaster either. You're obviously passionate about this, but everything you're saying is to convince people to apply the language we'd use if we treated human beings the same way we treat animals. The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.īut this is beside the point. Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. Historically in the US, to be a slave, you first have to be a person - and pets aren't persons.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |